Physics was my first love. This category contains the posts closest to my heart. Twenty years from now, if this blog survives, this category will probably hold my most enduring insights. And two hundred years from now, if I am remembered at all, it will be for these insights; not for the kind of person I am, the money I make, nor anything else. Only for my first and last love…
Archive for the 'Physics' Category
Ghost of Gravity
Tuesday, November 17th, 2009Some beliefs are superstitions, while some others are scientific theories. What exactly is the difference between them? Let’s listen to what Pirsig has to say about it.
Only a Matter of Time
Saturday, October 10th, 2009Here is an unreal look at the what and why of time. Why do we have a sense of time when none of our five senses can sense it?
Half a Bucket of Water
Friday, October 2nd, 2009When philosophers look at anything, it becomes a bit technical. Their technical analysis may sound boring and irrelevant. Here is an attempt to tilt things in their favor.
On Rationality and Delusions
Friday, September 25th, 2009What do we mean by rationality? Why do we think it is a good thing to be rational?
Blind-Sight
Saturday, August 22nd, 2009Blind-sight is an interesting neurological syndrome, and a philosophical conundrum. It shows how we may have senses that we are not consciously aware of. If there are senses that we can be unaware of, how sure can we be of the “sensed”? Or of our “delusions”?
A Plausible God
Monday, August 17th, 2009Here is a concept of God that doesn’t violate the known principles of science, and should therefore be consistent with the so-called scientific worldview. Mind you, plausibility of the concept says nothing about its veracity; but it may say something about it being a delusion.
Modeling the Models
Saturday, August 1st, 2009Mathematical finance is built on a couple of assumptions. The most fundamental of them is the one on market efficiency. Is it wise to trust this assumption? Are there limits to it? Are we operating at the right scale to ignore the shakiness of the market efficiency assumption?
The Big Bang Theory – Part II
Thursday, November 20th, 2008This post is a continuation of my earlier musings on the Big Bang theory. This one looks at the foundational assumptions of quantum gravity. In management speak, it is a high level overview, which sounds like I understand it. In a physicist’s lingo, it is merely a layman description or a hand-waving argument. In other words, the management types out there may like it better than the smart ones. You be the judge!
Chaos and Uncertainty
Thursday, November 13th, 2008This article appeared in the Wilmott Magazine in Jan 2009, and talks not quite about the chaos and uncertainty of the last few months in finance industry can be summarized in two words. It is more about the physics concepts bearing the same names, and how they can be applied to the turmoil in the financial and economic world.
Why the Speed of Light?
Monday, November 10th, 2008Another post in the latest blitz of physics/philosophy articles, this one presents an idea that the significance of the speed of light a la Special Relativity is a consequence of our perception rather than an assumption.
What is Space?
Sunday, November 9th, 2008This post examines the realness of our space perception. (Why did you think this blog was called Unreal?)
Light Travel Time Effects and Cosmological Features
Saturday, November 8th, 2008This unpublished article is a sequel to my earlier paper (also posted as Are Radio Sources and Gamma Ray Bursts Luminal Booms?). This blog version contains the abstract, introduction and conclusions. The full version of the article is available as a PDF file.
Read the rest of "Light Travel Time Effects and Cosmological Features"
Are Radio Sources and Gamma Ray Bursts Luminal Booms?
Friday, November 7th, 2008This post is the blog version of my article published in the International Journal of Modern Physics D (IJMP-D) in 2007, soon to become the Top Accessed Article of the journal by Jan 2008. Although it might seem like a hard core physics article, it is in fact an application of the philosophical insight permeating this blog and my book.
Read the rest of "Are Radio Sources and Gamma Ray Bursts Luminal Booms?"
The Big Bang Theory
Tuesday, October 21st, 2008People present the Big Bang theory in physics pretty much like Evolution in biology. But I feel that it is disingenuous to do that. To me, it looks as though the Big Bang theory is so full of patchwork, such a mathematical collage to cook up something that is consistent with GR that it is hard to imagine that it corresponds to anything real. Here is a short list of my trouble with the theory.
The Unreal Universe — Seeing Light in Science and Spirituality
Sunday, August 31st, 2008This essay, originally written for a Singaporean newspaper The Straits Times, was published in an altered form in a philosophy magazine called The Philosopher. The published article (also posted in this blog — Perception, Physics and the Role of Light in Philosophy) had too much editorial input, I felt.
We know that our universe is a bit unreal. The stars we see in the night sky, for instance, are not really there. They may have moved or even died by the time we get to see them. [...]
Read the rest of "The Unreal Universe — Seeing Light in Science and Spirituality"
Uncertainly Principle
Tuesday, August 26th, 2008One of the few features in physics that have captured the public attention, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle figures way up there with the Big Bang and E=mc2. It is an independent axiom, standing on its own, not reducible to any other more fundamental principles. However, here is an Unreal attempt to derive it.
Sex and Physics — According to Feynman
Tuesday, August 19th, 2008Richard Feynman on physics and sex. My serious and not-so-serious thoughts on the words of the great man, aptly described as ‘No Ordinary Genius.’
The Philosophy of Special Relativity — A Comparison between Indian and Western Interpretations
Wednesday, August 6th, 2008In this blog version of an article published in Omega, I discuss how Eastern and Western views say essentially the same things when it comes to the nature of space and time. And how that view can be interpreted as a basis for understanding Einstein’s theories. [Journal Ref: Omega - Indian Journal of Science and Religion, Vol. VI, (Dec. 2007), pp 138-150.]
Einstein on God and Dice
Wednesday, July 30th, 2008God does not play dice with the universe — said Einstein. Whatever could he have meant? Here is my interpretation.


![[Google]]( http://www.thulasidas.com/wp-content/plugins/easy-adsenser/google-light.gif)
![Add to your Google reader [Google]](/img/google.gif)
![Add this blog to your facebook [facebook]](/img/facebook2.gif)
![Use Feedburner RSS Feed [Feedburner]](/img/feedburner.gif)
![Subscribe to Unreal Blog RSS Feed [Feed]](/img/feed.gif)


![My Next Book: Principles of Quantitative Development [PQD]](/img/pqd.png)





