Tag Archives: ateismo

Dio — A Personal Story

I want to wrap up this series on atheism with a personal story about the point in time where I started diverging from the concept of God. I was very young then, about five years old. I had lost a pencil. It had just slipped out of my schoolbag, which was nothing more than a plastic basket with open weaves and a handle. When I realized that I had lost the pencil, I was quite upset. I think I was worried that I would get a scolding for my carelessness. Vedi, my family wasn’t rich. We were slightly better off than the households in our neighborhood, but quite poor by any global standards. The new pencil was, a me, a prized possession.

Continua a leggere

The Origins of Gods

The atheist-theist debate boils down to a simple question — Did humans discover God? O, did we invent Him? The difference between discovering and inventing is the similar to the one between believing and knowing. Theist believe that there was a God to be discovered. Atheists “sapere” that we humans invented the concept of God. Belief and knowledge differ only slightly — knowledge is merely a very very strong belief. A belief is considered knowledge when it fits in nicely with a larger worldview, which is very much like how a hypothesis in physics becomes a theory. While a theory (such as Quantum Mechanics, per esempio) is considered to be knowledge (or the way the physical world really is), it is best not to forget the its lowly origin as a mere hypothesis. My focus in this post is the possible origin of the God hypothesis.

Continua a leggere

Atheism and Unreal God

The only recourse an atheist can have against this argument based on personal experience is that the believer is either is misrepresenting his experience or is mistaken about it. I am not willing to pursue that line of argument. I know that I am undermining my own stance here, but I would like to give the theist camp some more ammunition for this particular argument, and make it more formal.

Continua a leggere

Atheism vs. God Experience

I have a reason for delaying this post on the fifth and last argument for God by Dr. William Lane Craig. It holds more potency than immediately obvious. While it is easy to write it off because it is a subjective, experiential argument, the lack of credence we attribute to subjectivity is in itself a result of our similarly subjective acceptance of what we consider objective reason and rationality. I hope that this point will become clearer as you read this post and the next one.

Continua a leggere

Atheism and the Morality of the Godless

In the previous post, we considered the cosmological argument (that the Big Bang theory is an affirmation of a God) and a teleological argument (that the highly improbable fine-tuning of the universe proves the existence of intelligent creation). We saw that the cosmological argument is nothing more than an admission of our ignorance, although it may be presented in any number of fancy forms (such as the cause of the universe is an uncaused cause, which is God, per esempio). The teleological argument comes from a potentially wilful distortion of the anthropic principle. The next one that Dr. Craig puts forward is the origin of morality, which has no grounding if you assume that atheism is true.

Continua a leggere

Atheism – Christian God, or Lack Thereof

Prof. William Lane Craig is way more than a deist; he is certainly a theist. Infatti, he is more than that; he believes that God is as described in the scriptures of his flavor of Christianity. I am not an expert in that field, so I don’t know exactly what that flavor is. But the arguments he gave do not go much farther than the deism. He gave five arguments to prove that God exists, and he invited Hitchens to refute them. Hitchens did not; almeno, not in an enumerated and sequential fashion I plan to do here.

Continua a leggere

Atheism – Is There a God?

Recentemente, I have been listening to some debates on atheism by Christopher Hitchens, as recommended by a friend. Although I agree with almost everything Hitchens says (said rather, because he is no longer with us), I find his tone bit too flippant and derisive for my taste, much like The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins. I am an atheist, as those who have been following my writings may know. Given that an overwhelming majority of people do believe in some sort of a supreme being, at times I feel kind of compelled to answer the question why I don’t believe in one.

Continua a leggere

Credi in Dio?

Ho messo nei guai per aver posto questa domanda una volta. La persona che ho posto la domanda si arrabbiò perché sentiva che era troppo personale. Quindi io non ho intenzione di chiederti se credi in Dio. Non dirmi — Vi dirò! Vorrei anche dirvi un po 'di più sulla tua personalità più avanti in questo post.

Ok, qui è l'affare. Si prende il quiz qui sotto. Ha oltre 40 -vero o falso domande sulle tue abitudini e manierismi. Una volta che li si risponde, Vi dirò se si crede in Dio, e se così, quanto. Se ti annoi dopo diciamo 20 domande o così, va bene, you can quit the quiz and get the Rate. Ma i più domande si risponde, la più accurata la mia ipotesi circa la vostra fede sta per essere.

Once you have your Score (o Rate, se non avete finito il quiz), fare clic sul pulsante corrispondente ad esso.

& Nbsp; & Nbsp; & Nbsp; & Nbsp; & Nbsp;

Ecco come funziona. C'è una divisione del lavoro in corso nel nostro cervello, secondo la teoria della specializzazione emisferica delle funzioni cerebrali. In questa teoria, l'emisfero sinistro del cervello è considerata l'origine del pensiero logico e analitico, e l'emisfero destro è l'origine del pensiero creativo e intuitivo. Il cosiddetto persona sinistro-cervello è pensato per essere lineare, logico, analitico, e freddo; e la persona giusta-cervello è pensato per essere spaziale, creativo, mistico, intuitivo, ed emotivo.

Questa nozione di specializzazione emisferica solleva una questione interessante: è ateismo legato alla emisfero logico? Sono atei meno emotivi? Credo di si, e questo test si basa sulla convinzione che. I test quiz se siete “sinistro-cervello” persona. Se il vostro punteggio alto, il tuo cervello sinistro è dominante, e si rischia di essere più analitico e logico che intuitivo o creativo. E, secondo la mia congettura, si rischia di essere un ateo. Ha funzionato per voi?

Bene, anche se non ha fatto, ora sapete se siete analitico o intuitivo. Si prega di lasciare un commento per farmi sapere come funzionava.

[Questo post è un estratto modificato dal mio libro L'Unreal Universe]

Foto di Waiting For The Word