Recap of Modern Physics

Physics of Small Things

  • Recap of Modern Physics
The safer, easier way to pay online.
"Particles and Interactions" is available as a beautifully designed printable eBook compatible with mobile devices. Get it now for $5.49 for immediate download!

Since the post series on Particles and Interactions became a bit longer than I wanted, I thought I would break it up. Let’s start with a recap of modern physics that will you will need to understand the structure of matter.

We need 量子力学,,en,粒子与相互作用,,en,还原论,,en,古典物理学,,en,量子力学的历史渊源,,en,量子场论,,en,量子力学-解释,,en,狭义相对论,,en,光速,,en,狭义相对论的解释,,en,电子书版本的《粒子与相互作用》现已推出,,en,可作为与移动设备兼容的设计精美的可打印电子书提供,,en,立即获取,,en,质量管理,,de,是小事物的物理学,,en,他们的行为举止如何相互影响,,en,QM的这种框架明显缺席的原因,,en,为什么小事情做什么,这是质量管理一个问题,,en,如果您要在这个主题上取得进展,,en,最好的选择是遏制问为什么,,en,自然就是她,,en to understand subatomic structure because the sizes we are dealing with are smaller than what we can describe using classical physics. We are dealing with a reality beyond what we can see or imagine. We also need to use Special Relativity because of the speeds involved are comparable to that of light. We are again dealing with a space-time structure beyond our direct perceptual grasp although we don’t usually think of it that way. I do.

We can look at it in a slightly different way. When we discussed the smallest unit, we saw that in biology, we have the cell. In chemistry, we have molecules, and in (classical) physics, we have the atom. Once we break up the smallest unit, we cannot expect the a continuity in its behavior, or features. Break up a live cell and what we get are dead chemicals. We mover from the domain of biology to that of chemistry Break up a molecule and we get atoms with vastly different properties. Compounds turn into elements. For instance, waterthe most familiar compoundbecomes hydrogen and oxygen, which have no similarity whatsoever with water.

Similarly, when we break up an atom into subatomic particles, what we have is not matter as you know it. It behaves very differently. In the QM picture, we cannot really think of particles as point-like, or even matter-like. It obeys, or is spread out, like a wave function. Don’t think of it as “a particle has an associated wave function,” rather as the particle is the wave function. Its properties are operators on the wave function, which is the so-called first quantization.

Once you have multiple particles interacting, we have action at a distance. The way it is modeled in classical physics is through fields. In QM, fields also become operators acting on combined wave functions, which is known as the second quantization.

I know, it is a lot of jargon. What I really want to focus, however, is on the ideas behind the study of particles, and their historical evolution. This is why I wistfully call this series the philosophy of particles, although it is bit short on actual philosophy.

Comments