I am an atheist. So I agree completely with all the arguments of கடவுள் மாயை. As a review of the book, that statement should be the end of it. But somehow the book gave me a strange feeling of dissatisfaction. நீங்கள் பார்க்கிறீர்கள், you may believe in God. Or you may not. Or you may actively believe that there is no God. I fall in this the last category. But I still know that it is only my belief, and that thought fills me with a humility that I feel Dawkins lacks.
இப்பொழுது, it is one thing to say that the concept of God is inconsistent with the worldview you have developed, perhaps with the help of science. The concept is indeed very inconsistent with my own personal worldview, which is why I am an atheist. But it is quite a different matter to discount the concept as a delusion. I believe that our knowledge is incomplete. And that there is plenty of room for a possible God to hide beyond the realms of our current knowledge. Does it mean that we should call our ignorance God and kneel before it? நான் அப்படி நினைக்கவில்லை, but if somebody does, that is their prerogative.
நீங்கள் பார்க்கிறீர்கள், it is all a question of what your worldview is. And how much rigor and consistency you demand of it. அப்படி, what is a worldview? என் கருத்து, a worldview is the extension of your knowledge. We all have a certain amount of knowledge. We also have a lot of sensory data that comes in every moment that we have to process. We do most of this processing automatically, without conscious effort. But some of the higher level data and information that we encounter merit a closer analysis. How do we do it, given that we may not know much about it? We use our commonsense, our pre-conceived notions, the value systems our parents and teachers left in us and so on. One of these things that we use, or perhaps the totality of these things, is our worldview.
ஒரு உதாரணமாக எடுத்து கொள்வோம். Douglas Adams tells us that dolphins are actually smarter than us and have regular inter-galactic communication. சரி, we have no way of refuting this claim (இது, நிச்சயமாக, is only a joke). But our worldview tells us that it is unlikely to be true. And we don’t believe it — as though we know it is not true.
Another example, one that Bertram Russell once cited. Scripture tells us that faith can move mountains. Some people believe it. Science tells us that a nuclear blast can, அதே, move mountains. Some people believe that too. Note that most people haven’t directly witnessed either. But even for those who believe in the faith-mountain connection, nuclear energy moving mountains is far more plausible a belief. It is just a lot more consistent with our current worldview.
இப்பொழுது, just because God is a delusion according to Dawkins’s worldview (or mine, for that matter), should you buy it? Not unless it is inconsistent with yours as well. Worldviews are hard to change. So are our stances vis-a-vis God and science, when seen as belief-systems — as the movie Contact vividly illustrates. நீங்கள் அதை தவற விட்டால், you should watch it. Repeatedly, தேவைப்பட்டால். It is a good movie anyway.
It is true what they say about a scientific worldview being inconsistent with any sensible notion of a god. But worldviews are a funny thing. Nothing prevents you from tolerating inconsistencies in your worldview. Although Dawkins goes to some length to absolve Einstein of this lack of consistency, the conventional wisdom is that he did believe in God. The truth of the matter is that our collective knowledge (even after adding Einstein’s massive contribution) is limited. There really is plenty of room beyond its limits for God (or eight million gods, if I were to believe my parents), as I will try to show in my next post.
என்று, எனினும், is only the tip of the iceberg. Once we admit that there are limits to our knowledge, and to what is knowable, we will soon find ourselves staring at other delusions. What is the point it discounting a God delusion, while embracing a space-delusion? In a universe that is unreal, everything is a delusion, not just God. நான் தெரிகிறேன், you think it is just my sanity that is unreal, but I may convince you otherwise. In another post.