To a physicist, life is a neat example of electromagnetic interaction. To a biologist, egter, life is a DNA replication algorithm. Let’s mull over the biology view for a few moments.
The genes in our body have only one motive–to get replicated. Our body is created in accordance with a blue print encoded in the genes to “run” this algorithm. How this algorithm gets mapped to our higher level goals and emotions is what life is all about to most people who are not physicists or biologists.
A simple mapping of this algorithm leads to the maxim in evolution “the survival of the fittest.” Any mutation that has the tiniest advantage in terms of survivability gets amplified over time. Net, all disadvantaged genes get wiped out.
But evolution in humans (and through our influence, the whole echo-system) has taken a new turn. Survival of the fittest used to mean the survival of the strongest or the smartest. Byvoorbeeld, if I had a genetic condition that made me prone to some life-threatening disease (Met ander woorde, if I was not very strong), my chances of passing on my genes would be a little smaller.
Egter, because of the advances in medicine, the survival chances for such disadvantaged genes are normalized to roughly the same level as those of the rest of the species. Dan weer, because of the dependence of the quality of health care on money, the survival chances get distorted in favor of the rich. So, is the mapping of the DNA algorithm now “the survival of the richest?”
Wealth is considered a product of intelligence. But intelligence (as defined by money-making ability) is not necessarily genetic. It may be, but we do not know that yet. So over several generations, it is not even the richest that survive, because time averages out the survival chances.
So what exactly is going to survive?
Ref: This post is an excerpt from my book, Die onwerklik Heelal.