Ciò che è reale? Le discussioni con Ranga.

Il mio, Maggio 21, 2007 a 9:15 PM

I recognized that the notion of an absolute reality needed more rigor in its argument. I modified one of my articles ( to address (or at least side-step) il problema. Here is how I see it (This is written in the Brahman-Maya context, but it is essentially the same in noumenal-phenomenal context as well):

“From a scientific perspective, we may study the workings of our senses in an attempt to understand the process creating Maya and see the reason why light is so special in our phenomenal notions of space and time.

For this purpose, we describe our sensory and cognitive process or the creation of Maya as follows. It starts with our senses. The sensory signals that our senses collect are presumably caused by Brahman, but they represent only an incomplete aspect of it. They are then relayed to our brains. Il cervello crea un modello cognitivo, una rappresentazione degli ingressi sensoriali, e la presenta alla nostra consapevolezza cosciente come realtà. Our visual reality consists of space precisely as our auditory world is made up of sounds. Così come i suoni sono una esperienza percettiva, piuttosto che una proprietà fondamentale della realtà fisica, spazio è anche un'esperienza, o una rappresentazione cognitiva degli input visivi, not a fundamental aspect of Brahman that our senses are vying to sense. The phenomenal reality thus created is Maya.

This description of how Maya is created is not perfectly in line with Advaita Vedanta, which emphasizes the unity and indivisibility of Brahman and does not accept any duality between our senses and what is sensed. Our dualistic description ushers in a tricky philosophical question. Who or what creates Maya and where? Non è stato creato dai nostri sensi, brain and mind because these are all objects in Maya. Maya cannot create itself. It cannot be that Brahman itself creates a Maya because, allora, Maya would be as real as Brahman. This philosophical quandary can be addressed in the following way. We assume that all events and objects in Maya have a cause or form in Brahman. Così, abbiamo postulato che i nostri sensi, mente e il corpo tutto avere qualche (sconosciuto) forms in Brahman, and these forms create Maya in our conscious awareness.”

This may not be tight enough as arguments go, but this is the best I could come up with.

Do let me know your thoughts.

– evviva,
– Manoj


Un pensiero su "ciò che è reale? Le discussioni con Ranga.”

I commenti sono chiusi.