海啸,,en,亚洲海啸两年半前释放巨大的能量在沿海地区印度洋周边,,en,你觉得会一直都发生了这种能量,如果出现了没有水从地震中抬走,,en,如果地震,,en,相同种类和数量的,,en,采取了在陆地上而不是在海床的地方,因为它没有,,en,想必这能量会一直存在,,en,它会如何表现,,en,作为一个更猛烈的地震,,en,或更长的一个,,en,我想象地震,,en,在横截面中,,en,作为悬臂弹簧被按下,然后被释放,,en,然后弹簧能量海啸转移势能的形式,,en,作为增加的水位,,en,由于海啸散发出,,en,它仅仅是被转移的势能,,en

The Asian Tsunami two and a half years ago unleashed tremendous amount energy on the coastal regions around the Indian ocean. What do you think would’ve have happened to this energy if there had been no water to carry it away from the earthquake? 我的意思是, if the earthquake (of the same kind and magnitude) had taken place on land instead of the sea-bed as it did, presumably this energy would’ve been present. How would it have manifested? As a more violent earthquake? Or a longer one?

I picture the earthquake (in cross-section) as a cantilever spring being held down and then released. The spring then transfers the energy to the tsunami in the form of potential energy, as an increase in the water level. As the tsunami radiates out, it is only the potential energy that is transferred; 水不横向移动,,en,只有垂直,,en,因为它击中海岸,,en,潜在的能量被转移到海浪击打海岸动能,,en,水横向移动然后,,en,由于能量从震中传递幅度,,en,我猜测,如果有对转移的机制会有什么发生过,,en,有什么想法吗,,en,我张贴了这个问题,这是困扰着我,当我读到他们发现了银河系约,,en,十亿光年,,en,我这句话的理解是,,en,在距离,,en,十亿光年,,en,有一个星系,,en,十亿年前,,en,所以,我们可以看到现在从它的光,,en,这难道不意味着宇宙是至少,,en,十亿岁,,en,它必须采取有关星系,,en,十亿年才能达到它似乎是,,en, only vertically. As it hits the coast, the potential energy is transferred into the kinetic energy of the waves hitting the coast (water moving laterally then).

Given the magnitude of the energy transferred from the epicenter, I am speculating what would’ve happened if there was no mechanism for the transfer. Any thoughts?

评论