Ang Buwan at Sixpence

Aminin ko na nagkaroon ako walang ideya kung ano ang nilalayong ang pamagat pagkatapos kong tapos binabasa ang aklat sa unang pagkakataon. Aking kamangmangan mananatili kahit na pagkatapos ng ikalawang pagbasa, bagama't ginawa ang pamagat iminumungkahi ng isang bagay tulad ng pagiging marangal intensyon at nakababagot katotohanan. Bago sa ikatlong pagbabasa, oras na ito partikular para sa blog na ito, Napagpasyahan kong hanapin ito. Tulad ng lahat ng magandang netizens, Consulted ako Wikipedia, na nagsabi sa akin na ang pamagat ay ang pagsangguni sa Ng Human Bondage (kung saan Philip Carey naabot para sa buwan habang binabalewala ang sixpence sa kanyang paa.)

Sa Ang Buwan at Sixpence, Maugham chronicles ang buhay at pakikipagsapalaran ng Paul Gauguin — isang masining henyo na stepped sa labas ng hangganan ng etika at moralidad sa isang solong pag-iisip pagtugis ng isang hindi kilalang at troubling paningin ng kanyang kaluluwa (“ang buwan”) sa malupit na kapinsalaan ng kanyang mga kaibigan at pamilya (ang “sixpence,” siguro.)

Sigurado kung paano lumikha ng isang perpektong Pranses (bilang siya mamaya confesses sa Ang labaha ni Edge), Pinili ng Maugham sa “isalin” Gauguin at portrayed sa kanya bilang isang Ingles Charles Strickland, semi-matagumpay, bagama't mapurol London Stock broker. Sa malamang na hindi edad na 42 humigit-kumulang, Strickland ay nagpasiya iwanan ang kanyang pamilya sa tumagal ng hanggang pagpipinta. Ang pangangailangan upang ipinta ay isang matinding pagnanasa ng kaluluwa para sa Strickland, at ito ay hindi mahalaga na siya ay walang magandang sa ito — pa — habang siya ay nagpapaliwanag, “Sinasabi ko sa iyo Mayroon akong upang ipinta. Hindi ko maaaring makatulong sa aking sarili. Kapag ang isang tao ay bumaba sa tubig ito ay hindi mahalaga kung gaano siya swims, mahusay o di-wastong na: ang nakuha ko siya upang makakuha ng out o iba Makikita niya lunurin.” Habang sine-save ang kanyang sarili mula sa metaphoric nabubuwal, Strickland ay hindi nag-iintindi o nababahala (lampas kalupitan) sa buong mundo. Pagkatapos muli, siya ay tulad ng matigas at malupit sa kanyang sarili pati na rin.

In portraying such a difficult anti-hero, Maugham showcases all the mastery and skill he possesses. To my untrained eyes, it looks as though Maugham builds this character so carefully and painstakingly that each one of the monstrosities Strickland commits is counter-balanced in some fashion. It is indeed a fine chisel that Maugham employs in crafting this masterpiece; none of those broad, confident strokes we would see in his later works.

We find Maugham at cynical and misogynistic best (or worst, depending on the perspective) in the early part of the book, especially in his descriptions of Mrs. Strickland and her children. We should condone this appearance of misogyny as a pardonable foible of a genius, I think. More than that, I see it as an effort, a successful one, to balance the callousness of Strickland’s disappearance that soon follows.

Such balancing devices can be found throughout the book. Perhaps to soften the shock of Strickland’s seemingly inexplicable renunciation of his family, his son’s hypocritical account of his later life is cynically ridiculed right in the beginning of the book. The unfortunate Dirk Stroeve, so cruelly used by Strickland, is also a buffoon who elicits derisive laughter rather than sympathy. Stroeve’s groveling adulation of Blanche perhaps serves to iron out the overtones of sexism or misogyny permeating the story. Blanche Stroeve’s betrayal is counter balanced with her own abominable indifference to Stroeve, which, in turn, gets evened out in what she receives from Strickland — “What an abyss of cruelty she must have looked into that in horror she refused to live.” Strickland, curiously, walks unaffected through all this death and mayhem, larger than life, tortured by his own private agonies of the soul well beyond our comprehension and his own. Even in his callousness, what Strickland invokes in Maugham and even Stroeve is, not merely a natural indignation, but an overwhelming compassion — astonishingly. The misplaced compassion is perhaps a device to prepare the reader for Strickland’s sordid and horrible death.

Maugham employs a variety of techniques to make the narration sound natural. If I was a fiction writer, I would study these techniques very carefully and try to employ them myself. To begin with, Strickland is a fictional portrayal of Gauguin, but Maugham takes great pains to pretend that the narration is not fictional. Even the narrator (Maugham himself) is portrayed as fallible, and contritely so, to lend credibility to the narration. For instance, Maugham gets exasperated at Stroeve’s weakness and is later ashamed of himself for getting angry.

The book has its elitist moments. When asked if it was better not to have known, Stroeve replies: “The world is hard and cruel. We are here none knows why, and we go none knows whither. We must be very humble. We must see the beauty of quietness. We must go through life so inconspicuously that Fate does not notice us. And let us seek the love of simple, ignorant people. Their ignorance is better than all our knowledge. Let us be silent, content in our little corner, meek and gentle like them. That is the wisdom of life.” It is as though the gift of inquiry and knowledge is given to a precious few — a special club to which Stroeve and Maugham are privy. This elitist attitude permeates not only Maugham’s works, but all great works of literature; it is only by masking his sense of superiority that an author or a thinker projects himself as non-elitist.

Perhaps it is some knowledge, or a vision of the world that Strickland’s soul yearned to share with the rest of us. Such communication is beyond language — a medium unequal to the task even when masterfully employed. Visual arts come closer. In Strickland’s tragic and cruel plight, along with that of almost all characters in the story, we see one eternal question. What is it that we are really after? Is it happiness? If so, Charles Strickland certainly didn’t find it. Very few do. Is it glory? Strickland did find that, albeit after his death.

Death is the great equalizer. It brings us back to the nothingness we spring from, however high we may fly or however low we may sink during the brief instant in between. The wisdom of the wise, the ignorance of the masses, the grandeur of the accomplished, the glory, the baseness — all matter very little when faced with such complete finality. In Strickland, Maugham has depicted the heights of glory as well as the nadir of baseness. The Moon and Sixpence — perhaps I have understood its meaning after all.

Photo by griannan

Comments

2 thoughts on “The Moon and Sixpence”

  1. Pingback: Incurable Disease of Writing | Just Write Blog Carnival - August 15, 2008 Edition

Comments are closed.