I just finished my first term as a professor at Singapore Management University. I taught an undergraduate course called Computer as an Analysis Tool, which is on business modelling and data-driven decision support. I had about 130 students, in three sections of three classroom hours each per week. مجھے یہ کہنا پڑے گا کہ یہ ساری چیز ایک بہت افزودہ تجربہ تھا,,en,بلکل,,en,اس بیان کے پیچھے کی وجوہات کی وضاحت کی جائے گی,,en,نظریہ اور فرضی تصور,,en,یہ غیر حقیقی بلاگ ہے,,en,سب کے بعد,,en,ریٹائرمنٹ,,en,پڑھانا,,en,کام زندگی توازن,,en,گودھولی سال,,en,ہماری زندگی کے کسی موقع پر,,en,ہم اس حقیقت کو قبول کرتے ہیں کہ ہم زندگی سے زیادہ موت کے قریب تر ہیں,,en,جو کچھ پیچھے ہے وہ اس سے کہیں کم اہم ہے جو پیچھے رہ گیا ہے,,en,یہ گودھولی کے سال ہیں,,en,اور میں ان کو قبول کرنے آیا ہوں,,en,افق پر تاریکی اترتی ہے,,en,اور غلط سالوں کے لمبے سائے اور چاروں طرف سے گھومتے ہوئے انسانی حالات سے بچ گیا,,en,میں باطل میں دیکھتا ہوں,,en,خاموشی اور بے خوابی کی ابدی زندگی میں,,en,یہ ہے,,en,تقریبا وقت,,en,عمر بڑھنے,,en,غروب آفتاب کیریئر,,en,درس و تدریس ایک عمدہ اور فائدہ مند پیشہ ہے,,en,میرے غروب کیریئر کے طور پر,,en,میں نے فیکلٹی کی پوزیشن قبول کرلی ہے,,en. Of course, the reasons behind this statement will be expounded on, theorized and hypothesized – this is Unreal Blog, after all.
Teaching is a noble and rewarding vocation. As my sunset career, I have accepted a faculty position at سنگاپور مینجمنٹ یونیورسٹی,,en,اسکول آف انفارمیشن سسٹم میں ڈیٹا تجزیات اور کاروباری ماڈلنگ کی تعلیم دینا,,en,یہ موضوعات میرے ساتھ اچھی طرح سے بیٹھتے ہیں,,en,کاروباری منصوبے,,en,اس سال کے شروع سے ڈیٹا تجزیات اور عمل آٹومیشن پر,,en,یہ سب میرے سبکدوشی سے باہر آنے کا ایک حصہ تھے,,en,ٹرمپ اور بگ ڈیٹا تجزیات,,en,ٹرمپ کی فتح بہت سی چیزیں تھیں,,en,میں اسے بہت سے محاذوں پر بڑے اعداد و شمار کے تجزیات کی ناکامی سمجھتا ہوں,,en,میری,,en,ذاتی نظریہ,,en,آنکھ سے ملنے کے علاوہ اس میں اور بھی بہت کچھ ہے,,en,لیکن جو کچھ بھی آنکھوں سے ملتا ہے وہ بڑے پیمانے پر ناکامی کی نشاندہی کرتا ہے,,en,بڑا ڈیٹا,,en,ڈیٹا تجزیات,,en,ڈونلڈ ٹرمپ,,en,پوسٹس نیویگیشن,,en,میری سائٹیں اور بلاگ,,en,اس بلاگ کو پسند کریں,,en,کتاب خریدیں,,en,جس نے اس بلاگ کو صرف پیدا کیا,,en,غیر حقیقی کائنات کی سرشار ویب سائٹ ملاحظہ کریں,,en,فیس بک پر مصنف کے بارے میں مزید,,en,Quantitative خزانہ میں اپنے کیریئر کک اسٹارٹ,,en, teaching data analytics and business modelling at the School of Information Systems. These topics sit well with my entrepreneurial ventures from earlier this year on data analytics and process automation, which were all a part of my coming out of retirement.
In connection with my recent retirement, my wife sent me an article (a speech given by someone on how to retire happily) which made several interesting points. But even more interestingly, it started with a funny story. Here it is:
In a small village in Kerala, a devout christian passed away. The local priest was out of station, and a priest from an adjoining village was called upon to deliver the eulogy. “Ladies and Gentlemen,” began the venerable pastor with the coffin before him. “Here lies dead before me a rare human being of this village with outstanding qualities. He was a gentleman, a scholar, sweet of tongue, gentle of temper and very catholic in outlook. He was generous to a fault and ever smiling.” The widow of the deceased sprang up and screamed, “Oh my God! They are burying the wrong man!”
True to form, this gentleman concluded his speech with another story.
First God created the cow and said, “You must go with the farmer everyday to the field, and suffer under the sun all day long, have calves, give milk and help the farmer. I give you a span of sixty years.” The cow said, “That’s surely tough. Give me only twenty years. I give back forty years.”
On Day Two, God created the dog and said, “Sit by the door of your house and bark at strangers. I give you a span of twenty years.” The dog said, “Too long a life for barking. I give up ten years.”
On the third day, God created the monkey and said to him, “Entertain people. Make them laugh. I give you twenty years.” The monkey said to God, “How boring! Monkey tricks for twenty years? Give me only ten years.” The Lord agreed.
On the fourth day, God created Man. He said to him, “Eat, sleep, play, enjoy and do nothing. I will give you twenty years.”
Man said, “Only twenty years? No way! I will take my twenty, but give me the forty the cow gave back, the ten that the monkey returned, and the ten the dog surrendered. That makes it eighty. Okay?” God agreed.
That is why for the first twenty years we sleep, play, enjoy and do nothing.
For the next forty years we slave in the sun to support our family.
For the next ten years we do monkey tricks to entertain our grandchildren.
And for the last ten years we sit in front of the house and bark at everybody.
Well, I managed to cut down my forty cow-years to a mere twenty. Here’s hoping that I will get similar discounts on my monkey and dog years!
After almost eight years in banking, I have finally called it quits. Over the last three of those years, I had been telling people that I was leaving. And I think people had stopped taking me seriously. My wife certainly did, and it came as a major shock to her. But despite her studied opposition, I managed to pull it off. In fact, it is not just banking that I left, I have actually retired. Most of my friends greeted the news of my retirement with a mixture of envy and disbelief. The power to surprise — it is nice to still have that power.
Why is it a surprise really? Why would anyone think that it is insane to walk away from a career like mine? Insanity is in doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Millions of people do the same insanely crummy stuff over and over, everyone of them wanting nothing more than to stop doing it, even planning on it only to postpone their plans for one silly reason or another. I guess the force of habit in doing the crummy stuff is greater than the fear of change. There is a gulf between what people say their plans are and what they end up doing, which is the theme of that disturbing movie Revolutionary Road. This gulf is extremely narrow in my case. I set out with a bunch of small targets — to help a few people, to make a modest fortune, to provide reasonable comfort and security to those near. I have achieved them, and now it is time to stop. The trouble with all such targets is that once you get close to them, they look mundane, and nothing is ever enough for most people. Not for me though — I have always been reckless enough to stick to my plans.
One of the early instances of such a reckless action came during my undergraduate years at IIT Madras. I was pretty smart academically, especially in physics. But I wasn’t too good in remembering details like the names of theorems. Once, this eccentric professor of mine at IIT asked me the name of a particular theorem relating the line integral of the electric field around a point and the charge contained within. I think the answer was Green’s theorem, while its 3-D equivalent (surface integral) is called Gauss’s theorem or something. (Sorry, my Wikipedia and Google searches didn’t bring up anything definitive on that.) I answered Gauss’s theorem. The professor looked at me for a long moment with contempt in his eyes and said (in Tamil) something like I needed to get a beating with his slippers. I still remember standing there in my Khakki workshop attire and listening to him, with my face burning with shame and impotent anger. And, although physics was my favorite subject (my first love, in fact, as I keep saying, mostly to annoy my wife), I didn’t go back to any of his lectures after that. I guess even at that young age, I had this disturbing level of recklessness in me. I now know why. It’s is the ingrained conviction that nothing really matters. Nothing ever did, as Meursault the Stranger points out in his last bout of eloquence.
I left banking for a variety of reasons; remuneration wasn’t one of them, but recklessness perhaps was. I had some philosophical misgivings about the rightness of what I was doing at a bank. I suffered from a troubled conscience. Philosophical reasons are strange beasts — they lead to concrete actions, often disturbing ones. Albert Camus (in his collection The Myth of Sisyphus) warned of it while talking about the absurdity of life. Robert Pirsig in his epilog to Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance also talked about when such musings became psychiatrically dangerous. Michael Sandel is another wise man who, in his famous lectures on Justice: What is the Right Thing to Do? pointed out that philosophy could often color your perspective permanently — you cannot unlearn it to go back, you cannot unthink a thought to become normal again.
Philosophy and recklessness aside, the other primary reason for leaving the job was boredom. The job got so colossally boring. Looking out my window at the traffic 13 floors below was infinitely more rewarding than looking at the work on my three computer screens. And so I spent half my time staring out the window. Of course, my performance dwindled as a result. I guess scuttling the performance is the only way to realistically make oneself leave a high-paying job. There are times when you have have to burn the bridges behind you. Looking back at it now, I cannot really understand why I was so bored. I was a quantitative developer and the job involved developing reports and tools. Coding is what I do for fun at home. That and writing, of course. May be the boredom came from the fact that there was no serious intellectual content in it. There was none in the tasks, nor in the company of the throngs of ambitious colleagues. Walking into the workplace every morning, looking at all the highly paid people walking around with impressive demeanors of doing something important, I used to feel almost sad. How important could their bean-counting ever be?
Then again, how important could this blogging be? We get back to Meursault’s tirade – rien n’avait d’importance. Perhaps I was wrong to have thrown it away, as all of them keep telling me. Perhaps those important-looking colleagues were really important, and I was the one in the wrong to have retired. That also matters little; that also has little importance, as Meursault and my alter ego would see it.
What next is the question that keeps coming up. I am tempted to give the same tongue-in-cheek answer as Larry Darrell in The Razor’s Edge — Loaf! My kind of loafing would involve a lot of thinking, a lot of studying, and hard work. There is so much to know, and so little time left to learn.
Photo by kenteegardin