Tag Archives: ateizm

Tanrı — A Personal Story

I want to wrap up this series on atheism with a personal story about the point in time where I started diverging from the concept of God. I was very young then, about five years old. I had lost a pencil. It had just slipped out of my schoolbag, which was nothing more than a plastic basket with open weaves and a handle. When I realized that I had lost the pencil, I was quite upset. I think I was worried that I would get a scolding for my carelessness. Anlıyorsun, my family wasn’t rich. We were slightly better off than the households in our neighborhood, but quite poor by any global standards. The new pencil was, bana, a prized possession.

Okumaya devam edin

The Origins of Gods

The atheist-theist debate boils down to a simple question — Did humans discover God? Ya, did we invent Him? The difference between discovering and inventing is the similar to the one between believing and knowing. Theist believe that there was a God to be discovered. Atheists “biliyorum” that we humans invented the concept of God. Belief and knowledge differ only slightly — knowledge is merely a very very strong belief. A belief is considered knowledge when it fits in nicely with a larger worldview, which is very much like how a hypothesis in physics becomes a theory. While a theory (such as Quantum Mechanics, Örneğin) is considered to be knowledge (or the way the physical world really is), it is best not to forget the its lowly origin as a mere hypothesis. My focus in this post is the possible origin of the God hypothesis.

Okumaya devam edin

Atheism and Unreal God

The only recourse an atheist can have against this argument based on personal experience is that the believer is either is misrepresenting his experience or is mistaken about it. I am not willing to pursue that line of argument. I know that I am undermining my own stance here, but I would like to give the theist camp some more ammunition for this particular argument, and make it more formal.

Okumaya devam edin

Atheism vs. God Experience

I have a reason for delaying this post on the fifth and last argument for God by Dr. William Lane Craig. It holds more potency than immediately obvious. While it is easy to write it off because it is a subjective, experiential argument, the lack of credence we attribute to subjectivity is in itself a result of our similarly subjective acceptance of what we consider objective reason and rationality. I hope that this point will become clearer as you read this post and the next one.

Okumaya devam edin

Atheism and the Morality of the Godless

In the previous post, we considered the cosmological argument (that the Big Bang theory is an affirmation of a God) and a teleological argument (that the highly improbable fine-tuning of the universe proves the existence of intelligent creation). We saw that the cosmological argument is nothing more than an admission of our ignorance, although it may be presented in any number of fancy forms (such as the cause of the universe is an uncaused cause, which is God, Örneğin). The teleological argument comes from a potentially wilful distortion of the anthropic principle. The next one that Dr. Craig puts forward is the origin of morality, which has no grounding if you assume that atheism is true.

Okumaya devam edin

Atheism – Christian God, or Lack Thereof

Profesör. William Lane Craig is way more than a deist; he is certainly a theist. Aslında, he is more than that; he believes that God is as described in the scriptures of his flavor of Christianity. I am not an expert in that field, so I don’t know exactly what that flavor is. But the arguments he gave do not go much farther than the deism. He gave five arguments to prove that God exists, and he invited Hitchens to refute them. Hitchens did not; en azından, not in an enumerated and sequential fashion I plan to do here.

Okumaya devam edin

Atheism – Is There a God?

Yeni, I have been listening to some debates on atheism by Christopher Hitchens, as recommended by a friend. Although I agree with almost everything Hitchens says (said rather, because he is no longer with us), I find his tone bit too flippant and derisive for my taste, much like The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins. I am an atheist, as those who have been following my writings may know. Given that an overwhelming majority of people do believe in some sort of a supreme being, at times I feel kind of compelled to answer the question why I don’t believe in one.

Okumaya devam edin

Siz Tanrı'ya inanmak mı?

Bir keresinde bu soruyu soran belaya. O çok kişisel olduğunu hissettim çünkü ben soru sordum kişi sinirlendi. Bu yüzden Tanrı'ya iman olmadığını sormak için gitmiyorum. Bana söyleme — Sana anlatacağım! Ben de bu yazı daha sonra kişiliği hakkında size biraz daha anlatacağım.

Tamam, Burada anlaşma. Aşağıdaki sınav olmak. Bitti vardır 40 alışkanlıklarınızı ve tavırları hakkında doğru veya yanlış-sorular. Eğer onlara cevap kez, Ben Tanrı'ya inanıyorum olmadığını size söyleyecektir, ve eğer öyleyse, ne kadar. Eğer söyledikten sonra bıkkın 20 sorular ya da öylesine, o tamam, you can quit the quiz and get the Rate. Ama daha çok soru cevap, imanınız hakkında daha doğru benim tahminim olacak.

Once you have your Score (veya Rate, Eğer sınav bitirmek vermedi), buna karşılık butonuna tıklayın.

& Nbsp; & Nbsp; & Nbsp; & Nbsp; & Nbsp;

Nasıl çalışır İşte. Beynimizde oluyor bir işbölümü vardır, Beyin fonksiyonlarının hemisferik uzmanlaşma teorisine göre. Bu teoriye, beynin sol hemisfer mantıklı ve analitik düşünme kökeni olarak kabul edilir, ve sağ hemisfer yaratıcı ve sezgisel düşünme kökeni. Sözde sol beyin kişi, doğrusal olduğu düşünülmektedir, mantıksal, Analitik, ve duygusuz; ve sağ beyinli insan uzaysal olduğu düşünülmektedir, Yaratıcı, Mistik, sezgisel, ve duygusal.

Hemisferik özelleşme Bu kavramı ilginç bir soruyu gündeme: ateizm, mantıksal yarımkürede ilişkilidir? Az duygusal ateist? Sanırım / böyle düşünüyorum, ve bu test inancı dayanmaktadır. Eğer olup olmadığını test testler “sol beyin” kişi. Eğer yüksek puan ise, Sol beyni baskın olan, ve sezgisel ve yaratıcı daha analitik ve mantıklı olması muhtemeldir. Ve, benim varsayım göre, Bir ateist olması muhtemeldir. Sizin için çalıştınız mı?

Iyi, etmedi bile, şimdi size analitik veya sezgisel olup olmadığını bilmek. Nasıl çalıştığını bana bildirin lütfen yorum bırakın.

[Bu mesaja benim kitaptan bir düzenlenen alıntıdır Unreal Evren]

Fotoğraf Word için bekliyor