The speed of light being a constant sounds like a simple statement. But there is more to it, quite a bit more. Let’s look at what this constancy really means. முதல் பார்வையில், it says that if you are standing somewhere, and there is a ray of light going from your right to left, it has a speed இ. And another ray of light going from left to right also has a speed இ. So far, so good. Now let’s say you are in a rocket ship, கீழே உள்ள படத்தில், moving from right to left.
The yellow arrow is the rocket ship moving at a constant speed of உள்ள, and you are the scientist standing in there measuring the speed of the light beam as it passes you. Even that simple statement is not without its complications. When I say your ship is moving, I have to say with respect to what. Let’s say the motion is with respect to the younger gentleman standing outside.
Let’s also say you are trying to measure the speed of the light coming from the source S1, which is outside your spaceship. You would naively expect to measure c-v, because you are moving away from it to your left. But no, you will get இ. The same holds true if you measure the speed of the light coming from source S2, which is inside the spaceship, moving with you.
If you think these results are peculiar, you haven’t seen anything yet. Let’s say the younger fellow measures the speed of the same light beams. He would also get இ! In order for this to happen, the space in the rocket is contracted (shrunk), and the time dilated.
The special theory of relativity is highly counter-intuitive (which is physics speech for nonsensical) because it is not as though the rocket is உண்மையில் moving. ஞாபகம், only relative motion has physical significance, which is the principle of relativity. For you, the scientist in the rocket, you are stationary, and it is the younger fellow outside who is moving in the opposite direction at a constant speed of v. So it is his space and time that are contracted and dilated. This is all very strange, but true. This is exactly the basis of the thought experiment they call the twin paradox.
The twin paradox is resolved once we realize that the travelling twin cannot make the journey without acceleration, and Special Relativity cannot be applied to accelerating (or the so-called non-inertial) frames. Since the travelling twin felt the motion because of acceleration and deceleration, he is the one who will be younger than the one that stayed back. The twin paradox is resolved using General Relativity, which can handle acceleration.